OZ 2.0, in plain English.
The investment timeline, the federal benefits, and the distinctions that matter.
Read the guideOZ KNOWLEDGE & TOOLS
Explore whether a property or investment is ready for specialist review. Start with your facts; use the guide for the explanations.
Organize the project or investor facts. See what is missing and what needs a closer look.
Start your intake 02 / FOR DEVELOPERSNine checks covering designation, property, capital, timing, and ongoing responsibilities.
Open developer checklist 03 / FOR INVESTORSEight checks covering your gain, investment window, vehicle, liquidity, and reporting.
Open investor checklistInvestor, fund, and project each need their own review.
New resource material reviewed September 29, 2026.
Screening identifies questions. It does not certify eligibility.
FURTHER READING
The investment timeline, the federal benefits, and the distinctions that matter.
Read the guideWhy designation and state tax treatment deserve their own diligence.
Read the guideA practical framework for reviewing the property, sponsor, capital plan, and economics.
Read the guideThe responsibilities that connect development, annual administration, and investor reporting.
Read the guide50 PRACTICAL QUESTIONS
Plain-English answers, with the next place to look. Start broad or search for the issue in front of you.
50 questions across five topics
An investment through a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) that supports qualifying businesses or property in designated census tracts. The tax result depends on the investor, fund, and project all meeting their requirements. Read more →
The 2025 law made the program permanent with recurring designation cycles and changed the benefit framework for investments from 2027. New zones, dates, rural provisions, and reporting rules make it important to use the applicable generation of rules. Read more →
To put eligible gain capital into a long-term investment while potentially deferring federal tax on that gain and excluding qualifying future appreciation. The underlying project still needs to make financial sense. Read more →
Generally, only the eligible gain amount you want to defer must be reinvested. Your original cost basis and other cash can be treated separately; your CPA should calculate the eligible gain. Read more →
No. For qualifying investments from 2027, it is generally recognized after five years or an earlier inclusion event. A qualifying five-year hold generally provides a 10% basis increase; special rules apply to qualified rural opportunity funds. Read more →
After at least ten years, an eligible election can exclude qualifying appreciation on the OZ investment from federal capital-gains tax. It does not automatically exempt annual operating income, the original gain, or state taxes. Read more →
No. Cash available for distributions depends on construction, leasing, operating costs, reserves, debt, and the partnership agreement. A development project may make no distributions while it is being built. Read more →
Depreciation may reduce taxable rental income. Whether an investor can use a loss depends on basis, at-risk, passive-activity, and other rules. It is a general real estate feature, not a guaranteed annual OZ deduction. Read more →
No. A 1031 exchange and a QOF investment use different eligibility, timing, ownership, and tax rules. OZ investing can involve eligible gains from assets other than real estate; compare the alternatives with your own advisers. Read more →
No. Review demand, purchase price, construction costs, sponsor capability, fees, leverage, and exit assumptions independently of the tax benefits. Read more →
Eligible capital gains and certain qualified section 1231 gains may qualify. Gain type, recognition date, related-party rules, and the applicable investment year matter; have your CPA verify the amount. Read more →
Potentially. The program is not limited to gains from selling real estate. The character and recognition timing of the gain still need review. Read more →
It generally begins when the gain would be recognized, but special rules apply to gains flowing through partnerships and other situations. Do not assume the date cash arrives is always the starting date. Read more →
Do not assume an investment made before gain recognition qualifies for later deferral. Coordinate the investment date and gain recognition with your CPA before funding. Read more →
Pass-through gains have special timing and election considerations. Identify who recognizes the gain, whether the entity elects deferral, and which permissible investment window applies to you. Read more →
Entity investors can potentially qualify, but the identity and tax classification of the taxpayer making the election matter. Confirm the entity’s gain and ownership structure before subscribing. Read more →
A fund may permit it, but that portion generally does not receive the same OZ gain-deferral and appreciation treatment. Qualifying and ordinary interests need separate tracking. Read more →
No. That is our target minimum commitment. Offering-specific investor eligibility, suitability, tax qualification, and any accredited-investor requirements are separate questions. Read more →
An IRA typically does not have the same taxable capital-gain problem the OZ incentive addresses. Retirement-account investing can create separate tax and prohibited-transaction issues; obtain account-specific advice. Read more →
Making the investment is only one step. Your CPA must make the applicable deferral election and complete the required reporting, using the forms and instructions for the relevant tax year. Read more →
No. The tract must have the applicable designation, and acquisition, original use or improvement, business activity, timing, and ongoing tests also apply. Read more →
No. Existing ownership, acquisition dates, related-party rules, and whether the property is purchased, leased, or contributed require careful review. A contribution does not magically reset the acquisition history. Read more →
Potentially as part of a structure, but contributed property is not automatically qualified OZ business property. Its treatment and the project’s qualifying-property percentage need to be modeled. Read more →
Related-party acquisition restrictions can prevent property from qualifying. Review ownership relationships and attribution rules before signing or transferring property. Read more →
It is a qualification path tied to the first use of the property in the zone under the applicable rules. New construction may follow this path; used, vacant, or previously occupied property requires a more detailed analysis. Read more →
It is a separate path for certain existing property, generally requiring additions to basis within a specified 30-month period that exceed the applicable threshold. Land, rural provisions, and asset grouping can change the analysis. Read more →
Land and buildings have separate roles in the substantial-improvement analysis. Do not simply compare a renovation budget to the total purchase price; document the allocation and applicable basis. Read more →
For a qualifying OZ business, at least 70% of its owned or leased tangible property generally must be qualifying OZ business property, applying the relevant valuation rules. It is not simply 70% of the construction budget. Read more →
Yes, potentially. Analyze which assets qualify, their values, how the buildings are used, and whether the project meets the applicable tangible-property and business requirements. Read more →
Yes, financing can be part of the capital stack. Debt terms must fit the budget and operating plan, and refinancing or distributions can have investor-specific tax consequences. Read more →
The QOF is the investor-facing fund. In a common two-tier structure it invests in a project business, often an LLC, that develops and operates the real estate. Each level has separate requirements. Read more →
A QOF generally must hold at least 90% of its assets in qualified OZ property, measured under prescribed testing rules. This differs from the project business’s 70% tangible-property test. Read more →
A working-capital safe harbor may apply to qualifying project-business cash when the written plan, spending schedule, and other conditions are met. It is not permission for unlimited or undocumented idle cash. Read more →
No. The investor’s reinvestment window, fund deployment and asset testing, property acquisition, improvement period, and working-capital schedule are distinct clocks. Read more →
Outside attorneys, CPAs, and other providers would handle technical services under their engagements. Opportunity Zone Partners coordinates the process, developer relationship, and investor communication. Read more →
The proposed framework includes a 1% annual fund-AUM management fee and a 10% project allocation alongside 70% to investor equity and 20% to the developer. The fee base and actual waterfall remain subject to definitive offering documents. Read more →
The proposed model has the project or fund pay these costs. Review the budget and offering documents for amounts, allocation, and how expenses reduce investor returns. Read more →
Do not assume so. The original gain may become taxable before the property is sold or cash is distributed. Plan the obligation using your own liquidity and the actual distribution policy. Read more →
Liquidity depends on the documents and market, and a transfer can trigger tax consequences or prevent the long-hold benefit. Do not assume a redemption right or a ready secondary market. Read more →
The transaction form, investor holding period, applicable election, timing, and state treatment all matter. Review the exit well before closing so the project sale and investor tax analysis remain aligned. Read more →
No. Our current map is a dated snapshot of the state’s public draft recommended and other eligible tracts. It does not certify federal designation. Check the official final records for the applicable investment cycle. Read more →
Eligible means a tract meets the relevant eligibility criteria. Recommended identifies the state’s draft selection. Nomination and federal certification are additional steps; neither map label means the designation is final. Read more →
The new designation cycle begins January 1, 2027. Confirm the final certification and applicable acquisition/investment rules rather than assuming the prior map carries forward. Read more →
California does not conform to the federal OZ deferral and exclusion provisions addressed in our guide. Model California taxes and basis differences separately with your CPA. Read more →
No. The new cycle has its own selection process. A tract’s old designation does not establish its status under the new map, and transition rules need separate review. Read more →
Identify the exact census tract for the parcel, compare it with official designation records for the relevant cycle, then review the transaction. Our city and tract search helps explore areas but is not a parcel certification tool. Read more →
No. Our display geometry is simplified. Confirm exact parcel and tract boundaries and official designation data before making a purchase or investment decision. Read more →
No. It is Brad’s property and an illustrative project used to explain the development and investment story. We do not represent that it qualifies for OZ 2.0, and designation is considered unlikely. Read more →
The address, current ownership, acquisition plan, existing improvements, preliminary budget, timeline, debt, requested equity, and intended operating and exit plan. The intake tool organizes these facts. Read more →
The gain type and amount, recognition date, investing taxpayer, funding availability, target commitment, liquidity needs, and intended holding period. Start with the intake and review the result with your advisers. Read more →
Reviewed September 29, 2026. Federal rules: IRS Notice 2026-40; qualification regulations; rental property and depreciation; California source notes. Older guidance must be read with the enacted OZ 2.0 amendments. These answers support adviser review; they do not determine individual qualification.